Re: [CR]re:old stuff


Example: History:Norris Lockley

To: jeremylieberman@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 21:27:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [CR]re:old stuff
From: Richard M Sachs <richardsachs@juno.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

it's all cool. i just wouldn't race on it. e-RICHIE chester, ct

On Tue, 11 May 2004 16:53:02 -0400 "jeremylieberman@earthlink.net" <jeremylieberman@earthlink.net> writes: e-richie wrote:

"not sure what u r saying..."

e: Nothing too profound. It was only and simply a relpy to your statment that you could not "think of a reason to use the old stuff- except that some of it is pretty". I was trying to give you a reason you (obviously you don't have too agree) might (and one that others here use) use to use the old stuff. You could/can use old stuff becuase it works good (in addition to it it looking pretty) enough for most uses. I was simply offering up what I believe is a good reason for you (and others) to consider. thanks, Jeremy Lieberman NYC NY