> From: "C. Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com>
> Subject: [CR]re: straw-man argument
>
> I posted Joe privately on this matter, but since he posted
> the list as well, I wanted
> to post these links for others to see. The usual definition
> of a straw-man argument
> is as I described it: refuting an argument that was never
> made, or refuting a highly
> distorted version of an argument. It is an underhanded way
> of winning debate points,
> and you see/hear it all the time in politics. When someone
> uses this kind of fallacious
> argument, it's usually because they're weak on the facts, or
> have no real confidence in
> their actual position on something... and I'm not saying
> Joe did that..we're cool.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/
Charles,
I've just had a look at your links and, frankly, I think they're a lot of pompous crap ;-)
Bruce
Dundee
Scotland