<josephbstarck@yahoo.com> wrote:
>what kind of "goof"
>qualifies as return-worthy,
"I erred on some brake bridge placements on a couple
Hollands -- major goofs -- I added some checks after
these expensive goofs. And when my work went into
paint, the painters would occasionally alert me to
things, and I became more attentive as a result."
=== === ===
thanks for setting the record straight; now i understand
the bar of quality you're trying to stay above.
you sold a guy a frame on which you've discovered a brazing
error in the bridge placement and you rectified it, re-brazed
in another one, and passed it off as a "new" frame? i could
not conceive of ever rebrazing a joint, or replacing a
bridge on a frame without considering it a "repair". iow,
that kind of stuff is unconscienceable (sp?).
how you can endorse this as "acceptable" while commenting on the standards of another's metalwork is, well, beyond me.
e-RICHIE
chester, ct