Re: [CR]Trek heavyweights???

(Example: History)

Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:40:09 -0600
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Trek heavyweights???
References: <BAY103-F1281FF181B1A0D37E16EEBBC4A0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To:


skip sinatra wrote:
> Once upon a time, I had a mid-80's Trek 660....and you are right, it
> was heavy. I think it was all the investment casting: seat lug, bb
> shell, fork crown, brake bridge...even the dropouts as I recall. I
> had friends who refered to it as the 'cast-iron" bike.

For at least a couple years in the mid-80s, Trek used a one-piece cast head tube on the lower end bikes. This was done primarily for ease of manufacture -- the casting had a shoulder built in on which the tube would seat -- straight-cut; no miter. The frames were brazed on automated equipment using electromagnetic induction instead of flame. It was a pretty slick process, but those head tubes were boat-anchors.

--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA