So 1982 Super Record components are on-topic and 1984 Super Record components are off-topic? Maybe the Papal indulgence should be for post-1983 Super Record stuff.
George Allen Lexington, KY
At 02:27 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote:
>I really don't care what the reason...just keep 1983 as the date. There is
>already a gracious amount of
>info in the archives about Record-C and such. If there is enough interest;
>please start a new chat for **IT.
>
>Nick Zatezalo
>Atlanta,Ga
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
>Sent: Apr 14, 2005 2:12 PM
>To: Tom Dalton <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>Subject: Re: [CR]moving the list line
>
>I think it is probably the introduction of indexed shifting and clipless
>pedals in the mid 80's that caused Dale to freeze the 20 year old rule
>when it hit 1983. I've argued for moving it forward to include C-Record,
>but to no avail. Based on Dale's past comments, I think he actually likes
>C-Record, but hates Victory and Triomphe which would also become on topic
>by moving the date forward, not to mention the indexed Shimano
>stuff. Maybe we should lobby for a special listmeister dispensation for
>C-Record only, sort of like a papal indulgence.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jerry Moos
>Houston, TX