As I understand it, any equipment in production in 1983 is OK until was stopped. No click shifting, clip in pedals, stuff like that. Ted Ernst Palos Verdes Estates, CA
> So 1982 Super Record components are on-topic and 1984 Super Record
> components are off-topic? Maybe the Papal indulgence should be for
> post-1983 Super Record stuff.
>
> George Allen
> Lexington, KY
>
>
>
>
> At 02:27 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote:
>>I really don't care what the reason...just keep 1983 as the date. There is
>>already a gracious amount of
>>info in the archives about Record-C and such. If there is enough interest;
>>please start a new chat for **IT.
>>
>>Nick Zatezalo
>>Atlanta,Ga
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Forwarded Message-----
>>From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
>>Sent: Apr 14, 2005 2:12 PM
>>To: Tom Dalton <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>>Subject: Re: [CR]moving the list line
>>
>>I think it is probably the introduction of indexed shifting and clipless
>>pedals in the mid 80's that caused Dale to freeze the 20 year old rule
>>when it hit 1983. I've argued for moving it forward to include C-Record,
>>but to no avail. Based on Dale's past comments, I think he actually likes
>>C-Record, but hates Victory and Triomphe which would also become on topic
>>by moving the date forward, not to mention the indexed Shimano stuff.
>>Maybe we should lobby for a special listmeister dispensation for C-Record
>>only, sort of like a papal indulgence.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Jerry Moos
>>Houston, TX