Re: [CR]Whitcomb vs. Masi

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Whitcomb vs. Masi
To: tsan7759142@comcast.net, "Classicrendezvous@Bikelist.Org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <MONKEYFOODUsebmspH20000411e@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org>


The correct spelling is Witcomb, for both the US and UK variations, as some of the bikes sold by the US concern were in fact imported from the UK builder. On eBay not long ago there was a Witcombe frame, with an 'e' on the end. This was a different and apparently unrelated UK builder.

Regards,

Jerry Moos Houston, TX

Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@comcast.net> wrote: My own reluctance to buy an American Whitcomb stems from tales I have heard of widely differing quality from bike to bike. I certainly would have no reservations about a bike built by Richard Sachs or Peter Weigle while they worked there, but I have also heard there were some real stinkers from there, too. While there is admittedly some quality variation from Masi California (I have been told by several folks who have seen an un-named collector's early twin plate that it was not too well done in their opinion) overall they are pretty decent bikes. Maybe a little over rated, but pretty decent. In light of this, there really is not much competition for my attention between Whitcomb and Masi.
Tom Sanders
Lansing, Mi