Re: [CR]better FINISHED?!?!?!?

(Example: Framebuilding:Restoration)

Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]better FINISHED?!?!?!?
To: Tom Dalton <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <20050721164510.94102.qmail@web50202.mail.yahoo.com>


As mentioned a couple of days ago, Peugeot has won more TdF than any other marque, and probably the next several places would also be filled with bikes which do not meet Masi's aesthetic standards. Didn't prevent them winning though, did it? The purpose of a racing bike is to allow a sufficiently strong rider to win races. There is absolutely no evidence that all of the factors you site made Masi any more successful at achieving that purpose than the "lesser bikes" you so love to badmouth.

Regards,

Jerry Moos Houston, TX

Tom Dalton <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com> wrote: "The Masi had a better finished frame, that's all."

If by finish you include the mitering, lug prep, brazing, cleanup, paint, decals, geometry, frame component quailty, and design details, I can't say that I disagree. I think Jerry has done us all a service by distilling his understanding of vintage racing bikes as he has. We can now weigh his opinions in the context of this understanding when determining their merit.

Tom Dalton Bethlehem, PA

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com