RE: [CR]Lambert/ Viscount ...results of completely unscientific and probably irrelevant poll

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli:Laser)

Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [CR]Lambert/ Viscount ...results of completely unscientific and probably irrelevant poll
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:34:29 -0700
Thread-Topic: [CR]Lambert/ Viscount ...results of completely unscientific and probably irrelevant poll
Thread-Index: AcWUPDYI7bytt7M9QdeI2xjfjhDP+wAC97Bw
From: "Mark Bulgier" <Mark@bulgier.net>
To: "Dave Van Hook" <dvanhook@yahoo.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


Dave Van Hook wrote:
> There have been 22 individual members who "admitted" owning at
> least one Lambert or Viscount either now or at some time in
> the past.
> No one indicated a fork failure ( the dead did not respond ! ).

If we extend that to all the people we've known or heard reliable reports about, and all the Lambert/Viscounts we've seen come through all the bike shops we've visited/worked at, do we still have zero busted death forks?

Zero for me by those standards (I think), and I worked at a large shop that sold quite a few, from early lugged Lamberts right through to the end of Yamaha.

I still wouldn't ride one though.

Mark Bulgier
Seattle WA USA