Re: [CR]Latex tube questions

(Example: Events:BVVW)

Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Raymond Dobbins <raydobbins2003@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Latex tube questions
To: Classic Rendezvous Bike List <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <MONKEYFOODoHzGkzMcv0000017f@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org>
cc: Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@comcast.net>

one thing that i do know from experience is that the latex tubes for clinchers are easily pinched/punctured during mounting. they are too delicate for clincher mounting, in my opinion. no matter how careful i was, i couldn't avoid pinching them a little, and that was enough to puncture them. after ruining 2 or 3 in a row during mounting attempts, i gave up forever. it just didn't seem that the ride benefits were worth the extra care and skill during mounting that they required.

ray dobbins
miami florida


-- Tom Sanders wrote:


> I know that the thread count on silk tubular tires is often cited as

\r?\n> the

\r?\n> major source of their vaunted riding qualities. It occurs to me that

\r?\n> these

\r?\n> tires all had latex tubes in them. Michelin makes some fairly

\r?\n> expensive

\r?\n> latex tubes that weigh in at only 65 grams each.

\r?\n> I am one who religiously pumps up his tires before riding every time

\r?\n> anyhow

\r?\n> and I am wondering... could some of the ride qualities of these silk

\r?\n> tubulars be due to the latex tubes and could I recapture some of that

\r?\n> by

\r?\n> springing the extra few dollars for latex tubes with my high quality

\r?\n> clinchers and get an improved ride? Would the savings in rotating

\r?\n> weight be

\r?\n> significant?

\r?\n> I think I will try it and see, but I am curious if similar thoughts

\r?\n> had

\r?\n> inspired any list members to try this same thing and if they might

\r?\n> report

\r?\n> their experiences and wither a conclusion could be drawn on whether

\r?\n> it might

\r?\n> be worthwhile to shell out for some latex tubes. I have also been

\r?\n> told they

\r?\n> are somewhat less prone to flatting, too, but that seems questionable

\r?\n> to me.

\r?\n> Can anyone say with reasonable certainty?

\r?\n> If this could result in nearly any ride quality improvement for the

\r?\n> few

\r?\n> dollars involved, it would really not be much of an expense after all

\r?\n> the

\r?\n> money already invested in stuff for many of my bikes. Ya, I know

\r?\n> someone

\r?\n> will say "Why not just get the silk tubulars, then?" My answer

\r?\n> would be

\r?\n> "Cost, and not needing the dreaded and evil glue or the adhesive rim

\r?\n> tapes."

\r?\n> Thanks,

\r?\n> Tom Sanders

\r?\n> Lansing, Mi