When did Reynolds introduce the 29 x 16 fork blade?
If this was originally described as 'Continental Oval', surely it is to differentiate from the round or D-shaped blades which were common in Britain.
DB Ak, NZ
Fred Rafael Rednor <fred_rednor@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The early, Continental Oval Reynolds blades are
> 29 x 16 mm. The NCO* Reynolds blades are 27.5 x 20 mm.
> Columbus blades are 28 x 19 (interchangeable with NCO
> blades).
> There was no third size of Reynolds road blade AFAIK.
> In track blades, the typical early ones are 22 mm in
> diameter. There are also 24 mm ones.
Greg, Thanks for being punctilious enough to include the actual dimensions. The blades I was asking about were in fact the 29mm x 16mm type. So now I'm wondering if the "Imperial Oval" name didn't come into use until the NCO (New Continental Oval) blades came into existence. Then again, perhaps we should just start referring to these blades by their dimensions - as Greg did - in order to avoid confusion. To be honest, when I first started caring about this stuff (say 1968) I hadn't yet heard any of these terms. All I ever heard were terms like "Reynolds size" and "Italian forks". And I was too dazzled to ask about things such as Durifort or any of the German stuff. Cheers, Fred Rednor - Arlington, Vifginia (USA)
_______________________________________________
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com