Brian:
I lost part of this--your paragraphs are getting clipped at 1024 characters, I think. Unfortunately, right where you cut to the chase. Not sure if it's at my end, yours, or just a 1024-character buffer somewhere out in cyberspace.
In any case, I think you are describing simple contamination from inadequate flushing. How do you know that the contamination causing corrosion comes from the original plating, and is not left over from the second, replating operation? Seems to me that any chemicals (which are, after all, water soluble) left over from the original plating would dissolve in the replating, and be negligible relative to the amount in the new solution.
Part of my problem here, I admit, is terminology. Acids are by definition water solutions containing excess hydrogen ions. They don't get "activated," although they can be created by dissolving substances that disassociate and liberate hydrogen ions. And, of course, acids aren't the world's only oxidizing agents, but that's a separate issue.
Steve Maas Dublin, Ireland
brianbaylis@juno.com wrote:
> Steve,
>
> OK, let me explain how this can work. I've seen it a few times. It may be somewhat rare, but it does occur. There is no way to tell in advance what the bike has been going through in it's years previous to being replated, but here's the way it happens. Almost every Italian frame I've ever seen that has chrome on the forks or stays has only one heat release hole in the fork blade or stay (seat stay). When the part is originally chromed, when plating solutions enter the tubes, they are never completely flushed out and complete drainage is impossible with only one hole in the tube. So there is not neccessarily a large amount inside the tube and maybe only a small amount, but it is there and the acids can be activated with the introduction of any moisture. That's the beginning, the original plating job left some solution behind; not enough to eat through the tube at the time or even over time. BUT! When a bike is replated the first thing that happens is the part must be stripp
ed of the old chrome. This is done by
> Before anything goes to the plater I make sure each tube has two holes in it so all solutions can drain completely and the plater does not drag chemicals from one tank to another while doing the job. This insures that nothing new is left behind, but I've seen a few occassions where about 6 months to a year after the new plating the tubes begin to rust through from the inside. There is very little that can be done from there short of either some serious repair work or tube replacements. One can see or even predict in advance that this may occur. There is a certain amount of risk in doing a restoration that involves chrome plating. Rely on experts with lots of experience with chrome to have the best odds of success. All of the chrome related problems I've seen involve either a plater who doesn't know how to do bikes properly or a customer who has taken matters into their own hands and caused a problem in some way, with the few exceptions being the latent acids. Technically,
that is from plater error also. I've
> So, the word "nonsense" will only appear in my explaination in this sentence. It can happen, although rare. I hope this helps you understand how this can happen. Stripping old chrome, polishing steel, and replating old frames involves a fair amount of work and a lot of care. Each situation presents a challange unique to the part in question and the people who handle the work need to adapt to each case the best they can. Working with old parts, especially chrome parts that have become rusty, requires the ability to judge how to best do the job and where to draw the line before lugs or crowns get too thin. By far the most difficult typical part is the Masi sand cast Fischer fork crowns. They are very pitted deep into the casting and it's nearly impossible to remove some of the pits.
>
> Brian Baylis
> La Mesa, CA
> Whe do lots of chrome and it's generally a pain in the ass.
>
>
>
> -- Steve Maas <stevem@mail.nonlintec.com> wrote:
> Here comes the resident evil-tempered curmudgeon and technological
> bluestocking again with more grumpy skepticism.
>
> I recognize that my chemistry is not what it once was--but,
> f'hevvinsake, precisely HOW does rechroming "chemically reactivate
> acids"? With 1000+ list members, we should have a chemist or two among
> us. Maybe even one who is a plating specialist. I'd like to hear from
> one of them on this issue. (I suspect that the word "nonsense" will show
> up in their replies.)
>
> The simple fact, however, is that things are replated all the
> time--motorcycle parts, car parts, household items, and so on--and I've
> never heard this kind of concern applied to them. Corrosion after
> replating does happen, of course, but is caused by inadequate cleaning,
> not some kind of "reactivation," whatever that might be.
>
> Steve Maas
> Dublin, Ireland
>
>
> Jonathan Cowden wrote:
>
>
>>This from Vintage Cycle Studios:
>>
>>"in some cases, redoing existing chrome may chemically reactivate left
>>over acids used as part of the original chroming process. These acids
>>may cause severe internal tube corrosion that may lead to rust- through
>>areas."
>>
>>Best regards, Jonathan Cowden Carpinteria, Ca
>>
>>
>>>Let me just comment that Waterford will not re-chrome. I learned this
>>>when they were still Schwinn, when they repaired the frame on my
>>>formerly all-chrome '65. Gave me my choice of colors and did a lovely
>>>job, but not chrome.
>>>
>>>Last year, when I had the '38 repainted by Waterford, I believe I
>>>noticed the same thing on the web site, or when I asked about redoing
>>>what had been a chrome fork on that bike. Again, the answer was
>>>negative.
>>>
>>>I suspect there is a reason...
>>>
>>>harvey sachs
>>>mcLean va
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> .