Re: [CR] Early Super Record Chainring markings?


Example: Framebuilders:Norman Taylor

Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:05:50 -0400
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
From: George Allen <jgallen@lexairinc.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] Early Super Record Chainring markings?
In-Reply-To: <102020050312.12475.43570B00000DE739000030BB2207000953CE0D909F09@comcast.net>
References: <102020050312.12475.43570B00000DE739000030BB2207000953CE0D909F09@comcast.net>


Did the markings change on the chain ring bolts and crank dust covers from "Patent" to "Brev" at the same time? I assume the change occurred mid-1977 as I have a NIB crank-set marked with the 7 in a diamond that has "Brev" chain rings, chain ring bolts and dust covers, IIRC. However, it's a possibility that someone switched out the "Patent" parts for "Brev" parts. It seems "Patent" rings are difficult to find. I'm still kicking myself for missing this one, a great deal at 26 bucks: URL: http://cgi.ebay.com/Campagnolo-Super-Record-53-Chain-Ring_W0QQitemZ7187482602QQcategoryZ36133QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Ebay Item # 7187482602

Also, are all the 41 tooth Campy chain rings marked merely <C> as mine is? Are they later vintage? Someone posted a link to a picture of one awhile back but I can't find it now.

George Allen Lexington, KY

At 11:12 PM 10/19/2005, gpvb1@comcast.net wrote:
>Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:22:57 +0800
>From: "Bill Talbot" <bulldogsrule@graffiti.net>
>To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>Subject: [CR]Early Super Record Chainring markings?
>
>Can anyone tell me how the early SR chainrings were marked? The only two I
>have are marked with Brev. Campagnolo <42>. Were earlier versions marked
>differently?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bill Talbot
>New Hartford, CT
>
>The early ones (1973-1977ish) were marked "Patent Campagnolo" just like
>the early Record rings were.
>Greg "Pat. not Brev." Parker
>Ann Arbor, Michigan