Re: [CR]Re: Shellac


Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:49:51 -0600
From: John Thompson <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: classic list <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Shellac
References: <1608103.1131640649432.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <1608103.1131640649432.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>


worthy2@earthlink.net wrote:
> I used to consider shellac to be a cheap, tacky wood finish, inferior
> to lacquers or polyurethane, until I was given a primer from a friend
> of mine who restores antique frames and artwork. He explained (by
> demonstrating) the difference between the common commercial shellac
> from a can (which he considers crap) and the stuff you "cut" yourself
> by desolving the hard resins in pure wood alcohol.

Harrumph. Real Men go out and catch the beetles themselves and render them down into shellac resin. :-)

--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA