Re: [CR]Is pantograph cool or ugly

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:50:27 -0500 (EST)
From: "Nick Zatezalo" <nickzz@mindspring.com>
To: e a <moschika@hotmail.com>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Is pantograph cool or ugly


>personally i really think panto'd parts are uber-cool and very eye
>appealing. and that sometimes, more is, well, more. so i can't say i really
>share your views. and that i would prefer the ornate lugs of say a hetchins
>over the straighter lines of most other lug sets. and actually, i find the
>Italia lug design on hetchins my least favorite.
>
>though i can appreciate the clean, smooth lines and simplicity of the forms.
>i guess i'm really a suckr for ornate lugs, and panto'd bits.
>
>so guess that's good because if we all liked the same thing, imagine ebay
>prices then! :)
>
>Eric Acuna
>Santa Rosa, CA

Personally I find most pantograped components to be pantograffiti. All too often it does little to complement the syle of a rig and usually creates a distraction rather than harmony.

Pantographed parts certainly seem to result in much higher selling prices when offing such items. I guess that's a good thang.

Nick Zatezalo Atlanta "home of the big fish tank" Ga.