Re: [CR]wtb the newest sutherland...

Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:56:33 -0400
From: "gabriel l romeu" <romeug@comcast.net>
To: brandon@ivycycles.com
Subject: Re: [CR]wtb the newest sutherland...
References: <44818E55.2090701@comcast.net> <8C8555E0E67B309-18C0-2416@FWM-D42.sysops.aol.com> <4481F277.3090709@comcast.net> <6988.67.22.39.37.1149382720.squirrel@webmail.ivycycles.com>
In-Reply-To: <6988.67.22.39.37.1149382720.squirrel@webmail.ivycycles.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

You are right Brandon, just got carried away with my 'frame' of reference. I will search for one... wouldn't mind the off topic current information though...

thanks

Brandon Ives wrote:
> No it's not absurd because the Sutherland's Manual is a CURRENT
> professionsl reference, and it's the only one. It's not designed as a
> historic document or for collectors. -- gabriel l romeu

next to bordentown, new jersey, usa
± http://studiofurniture.com Ø http://journalphoto.org ±