Re: [CR]track bottom bracket question

(Example: Production Builders:Teledyne)

Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 12:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]track bottom bracket question
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <495.33cf579.31d02a05@aol.com>


Tom,
     Before you make any assumptions about the crank-arms being damaged, consider first the response sent by Chuck Brooks. Also, if you read nothing else in my message, please read the comments I have hear the end...
     So, in my experience, the number on earlier Campagnolo spindles relates to the over-lock-nut dimension of the rear wheel and, therefore indirectly, the chainline. (On later Campagnolo spindles, the number related to the width of the BB shell.) The earliest Campy track hubs were for frames with 110mm spacing at the rear and crank spindles were about 105mm long.
     Here's why I think your whole situation is a bit confusing: those shorter spindle were meant for frames with narrower bottom bracket shells than the 68mm shell that I suspect is on your Raleigh. But my recollection is that those shorter spindles were meant to be used with thin-wall cups. So I wouldn't be surprised if, the reason this thing even fits on your frame at all right now, is that you're using thick wall (i.e. NR) cups. Otherwise, the adjustable cup would be too far into the frame to accept a lock ring.
     Does that sound reasonable? If not, please let me know, because I'd be interested in learning what the true story would be.
       Cheers,
       Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia, USA - Home
       of one of he world's great bottom bracket
       collections :-D


--- DTSHIFTER@aol.com wrote:


>
> In a message dated 6/25/06 1:53:44 PM, hayesbikes@gmail.com
> writes:
>
> << The spindle has engraved 110 on it, which corresponds to
> its length. I
> assume that this is the original bottom bracket, but when I
> attempt to put a
> Campagnolo track crankset on it, there is not enough room for
> the crank to clear
> the bottom bracket lug.>>
>
> Tom,
>
> The 110 on the spindle refers to the rear spacing and that
> spindle is
> 104/105mm in length (depending upon bottom bracket shell
> width - so check that as
> well). The spindle length for 120mm rear spacing was 109mm.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Chuck Brooks
> Malta, NY

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com