Re: [CR]One and one half inches-a crucial dimension.

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 15:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]One and one half inches-a crucial dimension.
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <20060805215422.DHLW644.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@smtp.ntlworld.com>


Ray,
     They were a bit narrower in those days. But the salient point is that the spacing between the rear dropouts was typically 110 millimeters (4 5/16 inches), wereas today we use 120mm for a fixed gear bike.
     So... 1.5 inches is about 38mm. On a modern track/path/fixed-gear/fixed-wheel bike (call it what you like! :-D ) the chainline is 42 to 43 mm. That's a difference of 5mm. Multiply that by 2, to account for both the drive and non-drive sides, and you get the difference between 110 and 120mm. So it all makes sense!
     Best regards,
     Fred Rednor - a chain line and bottom bracket
     aficionado, residing in Arlington, Virginia (USA)


--- greenjersey@ntlworld.com wrote:


> Just read this and in the unlikely event that it is news to
> anyone else I thought I would share it.
> Apparently on a typical early post war English sports bike
> with fixed gear the measurement from the hub and bracket
> centre-line to the chainwheel, and of course the cog, should
> be exactly 1 1/2 inches. That seems remarkably short. Were
> bottom bracket shells narrower in those days?
> Ray Green, Brighton, England
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Email sent from http://www.ntlworld.com
> Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
> Visit http://www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com