Re: [CR] Period correct?: English Vs. Italian hub threading

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Falck)

In-Reply-To: <20060830223318.54024.qmail@web82214.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20060830223318.54024.qmail@web82214.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: "Mark Buswell|SisuHome" <mark@sisuhome.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] Period correct?: English Vs. Italian hub threading
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:47:13 -0700
To: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
cc: CR <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

Jerrry, thanks for your response.

English and Italian freewheels and hubs seem to be compatible, no problem - I get that.

To clarify: If I were to have bought my Ciocc brand new in 1981, would it have had English or Italian threaded hubs?

Mark Buswell San Francisco, CA

On Aug 30, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Jerome & Elizabeth Moos wrote:
> I would do it without hesitation. English and Italian FW thread
> are sufficiently compatible that there is no problem if you don't
> install and remove FW's unusually frequently. Plus English FW's
> are much easier to get than Italian now, at least in the US, and I
> think ISO is closer to English than Italian, not that there is much
> variation among any of them. But maybe the real Italian purists
> would object to an English FW.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Moos
> Big Spring, TX
>
> Mark Buswell|SisuHome <mark@sisuhome.com> wrote:
> Newbie question with requiring what I think is a quick answer:
>
> Is it 'correct' or 'best practice' to put a wheelset with English-
> threaded Campy hubs on... say an early eighties Ciocc? Were Italian
> threaded hubs still the norm for such a bike at the time? Or had/did
> English threaded hubs take over by this time?
>
> I have read in the archives about compatabilities between thread
> types but couldn't find anything that answered this question.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Mark Buswell
> San Francisco, CA
> _______________________________________________
>

Mark Nevin Buswell / SisuHome\u2122 1/Half-Finnished DESIGN and ART

m 415.341.6516
e mark@sisuhome.com
w http://www.sisuhome.com (UPDATED SEP 9)