Re: [CR]the SS coupler dilemna...

(Example: Framebuilders:Rene Herse)

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:25:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [CR]the SS coupler dilemna...
From: "Michael Schmidt" <mdschmidt@patmedia.net>
To: gabriel l romeu <romeug@comcast.net>, "classicrendezvous@bikelist.org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Thread-Topic: [CR]the SS coupler dilemna...
Thread-Index: AcbeOcg0BnxaJkotEduDFQAWy8lbaw==
In-Reply-To: <4513475B.8080803@comcast.net>


Gabriel, None of the bikes that you mentioned are touring bikes so I would select a frame with the least collectable value because once they hack the frame, it is done. First choice is the Masi with the Merckx fork, then the 84 Cinelli.

My real choice would be to find a used touring frame in good shape for Simon to hack. BTW, Bilenky converted my McReynolds touring bike and did a great job.

Another consideration to save travel weight is to get an off topic bike made of ti and have Simon hack that one. If you just want the bike for riding without carrying panniers or loaded touring, that might be the way to go.

Mike Schmidt Stirling, NJ USA

On 9/21/06 10:15 PM, "gabriel l romeu" <romeug@comcast.net> wrote:
> It is time to get a porta bike made up by the good people at Bilenky in
> Philadelphia, and I am not sure which ride to have done. As I see it,
> these are the choices:
>
> 70s Raleigh Competition
> Dave Moulton Fuso
>> 80s Scapin
> 84 Cinelli
> Masi Nuovo Strada with a eddy merckz front fork
> 80s Spectrum
>
> so which, and why? I will be modifying to a bit of a touring drivetrain
>
> to add to the versatility of unknown terrain.
>
>
> thanks...
>
> btw, Rita is going to have her unpainted early Serotta...