RE: [CR]Serotta Davis Phinney edition ???


Example: Framebuilding:Tony Beek

From: "Scott Minneman" <slminneman@yahoo.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: RE: [CR]Serotta Davis Phinney edition ???
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 05:36:34 -0800
Organization: Work? Whassat?
Thread-Index: AcYfYLMsRkr7qZSFSlOVYMebxsWM/gACbR8Q
In-Reply-To: <000a01c61f5b$86ef6a00$1201a8c0@retrospoken.com>


The left chainstay bend was probably done simply to assure adequate crankarm clearance. If you look at how far out the bottom bracket those stays are, and the outboard-bias detail of the rear dropout joint, that chainstay would've been mighty close to many crankarms.

Scott Minneman San Francisco, CA

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of M4Campy Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 5:56 AM To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: [CR]Serotta Davis Phinney edition ???

Too big for me but I was wondering about the chainstay treatment on this. By design???

<http://cgi.ebay.com/Serotta-CSI-Davis-Phinny-steel-frame-and-fork_W0QQitemZ 7> http://cgi.ebay.com/Serotta-CSI-Davis-Phinny-steel-frame-and-fork_W0QQitemZ7

212668573QQcategoryZ98084QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Item number: 7212668573

May be out of timeline but KOF so I sneaked it in.

Mike Wilkinson

Castle Rock, CO