RE: [CR]Serotta Davis Phinney edition ???

Example: Framebuilding:Tony Beek

From: "Scott Minneman" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: [CR]Serotta Davis Phinney edition ???
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 05:36:34 -0800
Organization: Work? Whassat?
Thread-Index: AcYfYLMsRkr7qZSFSlOVYMebxsWM/gACbR8Q
In-Reply-To: <000a01c61f5b$86ef6a00$>

The left chainstay bend was probably done simply to assure adequate crankarm clearance. If you look at how far out the bottom bracket those stays are, and the outboard-bias detail of the rear dropout joint, that chainstay would've been mighty close to many crankarms.

Scott Minneman San Francisco, CA

-----Original Message----- From: [] On Behalf Of M4Campy Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 5:56 AM To: Subject: [CR]Serotta Davis Phinney edition ???

Too big for me but I was wondering about the chainstay treatment on this. By design???

< 7>


Item number: 7212668573

May be out of timeline but KOF so I sneaked it in.

Mike Wilkinson

Castle Rock, CO