[CR]Re: Rearward opening rear "Drop-out"

(Example: Racing:Roger de Vlaeminck)

To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
From: "Grant McLean" <grant.mclean@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:50:15 -0400
Subject: [CR]Re: Rearward opening rear "Drop-out"

Neil,

That's no theory, that's the reason! Vertical drop outs allow for the same short stays, and ease of wheel removal also. Anyone who has had the experience of having to deflate a tire to squeeze it past the seat tube knows this for a fact.

Grant McLean Toronto, Canada

Neil Foddering Weymouth, Dorset, England wrote-

OK, here goes with my theory:

On a bike designed for ultra-close rear wheel clearance, it makes sense to have a rear-facing dropout - the wheel just has to be fitted in to the dropout slots, and moved forward as far as it will go. No need to fiddle about, making sure that the wheel is correctly aligned, as you would with a forward-facing dropout, and with the wheel spindle braced against the end of the track dropout, extra insurance against it pulling over. With a forward facing dropout, some allowance has to be made to move the wheel forward in order to release it from the frame, so closer clearance can be
achieved with
a track dropout.