Re: [CR]Cinelli models and history...A little clarification would be really helpful...

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Ideale)

In-Reply-To: <112920060321.401.456CFC9D00060D36000001912200760180020E000A9C9D0A08@comcast.net>
References: <112920060321.401.456CFC9D00060D36000001912200760180020E000A9C9D0A08@comcast.net>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Cinelli models and history...A little clarification would be really helpful...
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:43:48 -0800
To: CR RENDEZVOUS <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:21 PM, hersefan@comcast.net wrote:
> Hee Hee -
>
> I knew the DeRosa comment would generate some feedback. But I'll
> stick with it - I've seen the Cinelli frames of the period with
> their paint off (down to the chrome) and they are really nice.
> Maybe the DeRosa is equal as Chuck says - but certainly the early-
> to-mid 80's ones and some of the early 70's ones had too many braze
> imperfections for my taste.
>
> Mike Kone in Boulder CO

Yeah well ya got me! I had a very early '80s DeRosa Professional done up in Mercedes Anthracite with all black anodized and pantographed parts (yellow Benotto Cello tape of course) that was _very_ clean! My biggest regret still is selling that bike when a couple of years later I got an Eddy Merckx Molteni after Eddy opened his own shop with Ugo DeRosa's help and the bike being a carbon copy of the Anthracite DeRosa. I had four or five bikes back then and thought it was too many... HEY! Stop that laughing you guys! STOP IT!!!

Okay, okay, I was an idiot!

Chuck Schmidt
South Pasadena, Southern California
United States of America
http://www.velo-retro.com (reprints, t-shirts & timelines)