Re: [CR]RE: [CR ]Too many cogs / New Rules

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:34:47 -0600
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
To: "'CR RENDEZVOUS'" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]RE: [CR ]Too many cogs / New Rules
References: <001e01c72b88$eb66d4c0$6600a8c0@WERNE1>
In-Reply-To: <001e01c72b88$eb66d4c0$6600a8c0@WERNE1>


Tory Werne wrote:
> I have always enjoyed reading Chuck's posts.
> I am not confused by the appeal of fixed gear.
> I'm building up a 1949 as we speak.
> I have phenomenal respect for the generation of riders who were required
> to
> ride fixed.
>
> But in the spirit of global communication, and an homage to Bill Maher
> ...
>
> NEW RULES
> Fixed Gear Riders should only quote their macho fixed-affection as
> follows :
> Chainring Teeth / Cog Teeth / Age of Rider / Elevation Changes You Ride
> !!!!

I think your formula needs some adjustment. Shouldn't we multiply by the age of the rider and elevation change rather than divide? Otherwise the older you get and greater the elevation change, the less macho you are when riding a fixed gear.

macho = ((chainring teeth)*(age)*(elevation change))/(cog teeth)

:-)

--
John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA