Re: [CR]Mojo or Nojo? Was: When is a Masi not a Masi

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

From: <freesound@comcast.net>
To: Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]Mojo or Nojo? Was: When is a Masi not a Masi
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:18:30 +0000


Sounds positively Wagnerian, such as when Sigfried (or Sigmund?) gained godlike knowledge and wisdom by eating the heart of Fafnir, the dragon he had just slain.

Ken "mojo is not a new concept" Freeman seeking mojo in Ann Arbor, MI USA


-------------- Original message --------------
From: Chuck Schmidt

> Joe Starck wrote:

\r?\n> (snip)

\r?\n> > Aside from the fact that the dimensions of the frame

\r?\n> > remain unaffected, as always though, ride quality is

\r?\n> > subject to post-repair original mojo -- buy hey --like

\r?\n> > Moses transferring HIS mojo to a select 70, did not

\r?\n> > any of Faliero and Alberto's powers alight on ME

\r?\n> > during the time I built Masis on the same fixture

\r?\n> > Mario Confente did? And, I've been to the Vigorelli

\r?\n> > and back.

\r?\n>

\r?\n>

\r?\n> You definitely possess mojo, JoSta!

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Reminds me of a long ago thread on CRlist. It went:

\r?\n> Mojo or Nojo?

\r?\n>

\r?\n>

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Chuck Schmidt

\r?\n> South Pasadena, CA USA

\r?\n> http://www.velo-retro.com (reprints, t-shirts & timelines)