Re: [CR]Direction of cotters

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20070211175758.01067740@mailhost.oxford.net>
References: <3.0.6.32.20070211175758.01067740@mailhost.oxford.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:55:27 -0500
To: John Betmanis <johnb@oxford.net>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
From: "Sheldon Brown" <CaptBike@sheldonbrown.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Direction of cotters


Also spracht John Betmanis:
> >Pictures at the following link:
>>
> >Paramount http://www.wooljersey.com/gallery/CV-6+Enterprises/Paramount/
>
>I see in those pictures that the heads of the cotters lead when the cranks
>rotate forward. On most bikes with cottered cranks I've seen (from a quick
>survey around the house), the nutted end of the cotter leads. Is there a
>right and wrong way to install cotter pins and why? Why would this
>Paramount be opposite to what I've seen?

It really doesn't matter functionally. The only way I know of that it might make a difference is that if you do it with the nuts leading, there's less risk of catching your trouser cuff on the cotter.

Sheldon "http://sheldonbrown.com/cotters" Brown +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Most things having to do with fixed-gear/SS are bone stupid, | | and folks who usually work on modern bikes aren't used to | | thinking at that caveman level. -- Aaron Meberg | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ --
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
       Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
            http://harriscyclery.com
       Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
            http://captainbike.com
    Useful articles about bicycles and cycling
            http://sheldonbrown.com