RE: [CR]Frame size/standards

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [CR]Frame size/standards
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:35:54 -0800
In-Reply-To: <677451.63575.qm@web30609.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Thread-Topic: [CR]Frame size/standards
Thread-Index: AcdOYBQ+ic7eND+eSTmbbmTgDNGzWwADsr9Q
References: <9327C3B25BD3C34A8DBC26145D88A9070643AF@hippy.home.here>
From: "Mark Bulgier" <Mark@bulgier.net>
To: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

After I completely mis-read Fred Rednor's post and stupidly criticized it, he (Fred) wrote:
> Mark,
> I think if you read my orginal message again, you'll see
> that this quote from your message is exactly what I was
> pointing out. Plus, the entire thrust of your message seems to
> agree with my point. Perhaps you have misread my abbreviation
> for center-to-center? I wrote "c-t-c" to indicate "center to
> center." By implication, "center-to-top" would be "c-t-t."
> Perhaps your abbreviations "C-T" and C-C" are clearer to you,
> but I don't see any disagreement in our arguments.

Whoops!

Quite so, and a thousand pardons. Really sloppy reading on my part, please forgive.

I thought that little voice was saying "don't get involved in this argument" when it was probably trying to say "re-read what Fred was saying"

Mark "I don't listen to those voices in my head" Bulgier Seattle WA USA