Re: [CR]Race-Durability in 1970's - 1983 ?

(Example: Production Builders)

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:05:06 -0600
From: "John Thompson" <john@os2.dhs.org>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Race-Durability in 1970's - 1983 ?
References: <200702140508.l1E58u2K013254@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <200702140508.l1E58u2K013254@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>


Donald Gillies wrote:
> (which fits with the CR timeline).
>
> I was surprised by an article about Darrel McCulloch and his work for
> the Australian national cycling team. In particular, he stated, "The
> life expectancy for these bikes is 12 months at the maximum" (article
> written June 2006).
>
> http://www.llewellynbikes.com/thegallery/Llewellyn-bike-test-in-Ride-magazine/aad?full=1
>
> For any CR members who were sponsored racers in the 1970's and early
> 1980's, what do you think was the life expectancy of your bike ?? Was
> it 1 year, 2 years, 3 years?
>
> What was a typical failure mode - A crash? A tube separating or
> starting to tear? A braze-on that broke-off ?? Or is it just that the
> bike looks ragged and - the factory or the sponsor is not set up to do
> repaints ??

For a professional team, it's because the cost of a new frame every season is trivial compared to the risk of a failure on an old frame.

--
John Thompson (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA