Re: [CR]28 teeth with Campagnolo Nuovo Record?

(Example: Framebuilders:Jack Taylor)

Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:36:48 -0800 (PST)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]28 teeth with Campagnolo Nuovo Record?
To: haxixe@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <75d04b480702191612k18f46924n2d4320fe38717f15@mail.gmail.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

--- Kurt Sperry <haxixe@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/19/07, Fred Rafael Rednor <fred_rednor@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been struggling with 26-13 standard-6
> > > speed on my Masi for a while, and I think
> > > I got it. This is a really short chainstay.
> >
> > So perhaps the crucial factor for those of us who have had
> > success setting up the Nuvo Record with a 14-28 (or even a
> > 13-28) freewheels was the chainstay length? I've never had
> > problems with this setup but I've never done in on anything
> > but 1960s (or early '70s) frames which had - by latter
> > standards - long chainstays.
>
>
> That would seem to jibe with the empirical observation that
> it is sometimes
> optimal or even necessary to slide the axle back in the DO
> slots to make a
> 28 work. What is that if not increasing the effective
> chainstay length?
> Luckily the bike I'll be trying it on seems to have real
> long chainstays to begin with. I'm optimistic.

Kurt, I realize that sliding the axle back is effectively lenghteningthe chainstay. I was merely trying to state this with a bit of politesse... So let's put it this way: if you're bike truly has long chainstays, and if you're going to keep the difference bewtween the chainrings to no more that 10 or 11 teeth, I'd be surprised if you fail to make this work. You probably won't even have to slide the axle back too far. Have fun, Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia (USA)

____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html