Re: [CR]New Reynolds 953 steel tubing

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Ideale)

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:12:54 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: [CR]New Reynolds 953 steel tubing
From: <kurtsj@mtco.com>
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


From: Roman Stankus <rstankus(AT)mindspring.com>

"Based on info from folks building with 953 - there isn't any significant weight savings over other super steel sets that have been on the market for some time - so no stainless bullet here. Maybe just a shinier one.

Roman Stankus Atlanta, Georgia USA"

hi gang,

and I think I read that a 953 frame is about 0.5 pounds lighter than an 853 frame. As much as a 953 frame would be very cool, there's not a lot of payoff for the extra expense. Of course, 953 *is* shiny, and that's worth something! :-)


>From: charles f nighbor <cnighbor(AT)pacbell.net>
> Yes Steel is real. Anyone have experience building a frame or riding a frame with 953?
> Charles Nighbor
> Walnut Creek, CA

has everyone seen Bob Brown's 953 frame?? Very, very shiny, and some delightfully fancy lugwork! Take a gander here:

http://bobbrowncycles.blogspot.com/2007/01/picture-show.html

just scroll down a little bit. The seat cluster is very tidy and attractive, and the head tube badge is a nice contrast of surface finish.

enjoy!

Steve Kurt
Peoria, IL USA