Re: [CR]Disappearing traditional bikes

(Example: Bike Shops:R.E.W. Reynolds)

From: "Al Fack" <bicycles@charter.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <20070404234433.11365.qmail@web83515.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <0B7D0243-DACD-4DCC-A8E4-B32FEB613F9B@earthlink.net> <A8FF55F7-36DC-45C2-8DDF-B525B9539D8E@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Disappearing traditional bikes
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 23:09:09 -0500
reply-type=response

First, for introduction, I'm new to the list, and truly humbled while reading the e-mails posted by so many very knowledgable classic enthusiasts. I've avidly ridden and built up bikes all my life, since the 50's, and I know so little about the European classics, but want to learn. The steel, lugged bikes I enjoy, ride, and collect in recent years are the early Treks, among others, like Raleigh, Fuji, Austro Daimler. I see a never ending stream of lugged steel bikes, and in my lifetime I don't forsee any shortage of these. There are so many enthusiasts that carefully use classic components that I don't see that stream ending either. I personally have enough complete bikes to supply 15- 20 riders and plenty of spare bits and framesets to boot. Just think how many collectors like myself have as many or more in the stable than I do. Of course, all bikes ought to be ridden, including the most beautiful, valuable rare ones. And there are many folks still getting into frame building lugged steel, and many of these are a lot younger than me, which further insures that bikes we love will continue to be around long into the future. HUH??? indeed.


----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Schmidt
To: CR RENDEZVOUS
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]Disappearing traditional bikes



> Disappearing traditional bikes???
> HUH???
>
> Does it sound funny to you too??? Traditional bikes seem to be HUGE on
> the internet!!!
>
> Chuck Schmidt
> South Pasadena, CA
>
> .