[CR]Re: [BOB] a low(er) trail experiment?

(Example: Framebuilders:Mario Confente)

In-Reply-To: <B71BBBB1-C59A-42CC-87D3-78E20DCFAEE4@earthlink.net>
References: <200704032357.l33Nvfaf027743@yojimg.net> <20070403175419.X62138@phred.org> <000101c77783$28513420$6501a8c0@maincomputer> <a0623096ec23abb5c2995@192.168.1.33> <eb5b4f6c0704051016v24d93760u8f99c724cf8874a0@mail.gmail.com> <a06230976c23ae1e4b507@192.168.1.33> <eb5b4f6c0704051049w7e267890rdab11f006b6be46e@mail.gmail.com> <a06230979c23ae8723e29@[192.168.1.33]> <77B9C92C-B438-4509-A0FA-4B20BE10EBA0@earthlink.net> <a06230982c23b0f33adbd@[192.168.1.33]>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:53:30 -0700
To: CR RENDEZVOUS <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: [CR]Re: [BOB] a low(er) trail experiment?

Oops... sorry for that cross post, group.

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, CA

On Apr 5, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Chuck Schmidt wrote:
> Jan Heine wrote:
> (snip)
>> However, I have to admit that I haven't studied the Raleighs etc.,
>> that served as inspiration here. My knowledge does not extend much
>> further than the high-end custom bikes... which in most cases were
>> racing-inspired.
>>
>> Might be a worth-while study, but another question is whether
>> these bikes are at all optimized for their purposes.
>
>
>
> I'd say, given that virtually all bike design is the result of
> trial and error, I'd have to say yes, these bikes, by definition,
> were optimized for their intended purpose.
>
> Chuck Schmidt
> South Pasadena, CA USA
> http://www.velo-retro.com (reprints, t-shirts & timelines)