Re: [CR]Why Campagnolo ???

(Example: Humor)

From: <Philcycles@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:39:59 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]Why Campagnolo ???
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


In a message dated 4/25/07 8:36:16 AM, nickzz@mindspring.com writes:
>Campagnolo's integration of replacement parts that spanned many years of
>production was a major appeal. It was nice to just replace a small
>non-functioning part on a component and go on down the road. No need
>to replace the complete component or find one that was exactly the same.

Well, that was one of those things honored more in the breech than in reality. When I had a frame business in the mid 70s I bought a lot of small Campy parts-from Apollo, remember them?-things like replacement pins and bushings for derailleurs and the like-and I still had lots of those small manila envelopes years later. Phil Brown Tripping doen memory lane in San Rafael, Calif.

**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.