RE: [CR]Was: intro... now: frame geometry


Example: Production Builders:Pogliaghi
In-Reply-To: <001b01c79b5c$78bfa2f0$6501a8c0@maincomputer>
References: <F016848C232375449D66E2D139DFED2F01B2A62C@IMCSRV4.MITRE.ORG> <8C9693BA807914E-7EC-7D4F@webmail-de18.sysops.aol.com> <000001c79b31$68080f90$6501a8c0@maincomputer> <8C9694D9B4EB4F3-1E8-80AE@webmail-db05.sysops.aol.com> <000d01c79b3d$df203a10$6501a8c0@maincomputer> <8C969562C736E1A-1B04-8141@MBLK-M03.sysops.aol.com> <002a01c79b40$44b95f80$0300a8c0@D8XCLL51> <a06230944c276c3eed436@[192.168.1.33]>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:41:25 -0700
To: "Ken Freeman" <freesound@comcast.net>, "'ternst'" <ternst1@cox.net>, <damann@mitre.org>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <oroboyz@aol.com>
From: "Jan Heine" <heine94@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: [CR]Was: intro... now: frame geometry


At 11:59 PM -0400 5/20/07, Ken Freeman wrote:
>Jan if you trace back through the thread, no assertion was made that
>chainstay is a critical aspect of handling. How to measure chainstay was
>the question.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to respond to a question with the second part of my post, just adding something new to the discussion. Perhaps I should have saved it for a separate thread. I never implied to say that anybody claimed that chainstay length was the determinant of bicycle handling. If my message came across as such, I apologize.

Jan Heine
Editor
Bicycle Quarterly
140 Lakeside Ave #C
Seattle WA 98122
http://www.bikequarterly.com