Re: [CR]More (!) about chrome Condor deal...

(Example: Framebuilders:Chris Pauley)

In-Reply-To: <8C96EA3D0C77F15-99C-424C@MBLK-M26.sysops.aol.com>
References: <8C96EA3D0C77F15-99C-424C@MBLK-M26.sysops.aol.com>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]More (!) about chrome Condor deal...
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 12:39:58 -0700
To: Classic Rendevous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


On May 27, 2007, at 11:27 AM, oroboyz@aol.com wrote:
> You know, I don't want to make a "Federal Case" out of this, but if
> you, I or anyone agree to a deal, it is a matter of personal
> integrity that we stand by it until relieved by the other party.?
> "Situational ethics", i.e., letting changing circumstances sway us
> in or out of a moral position, are an insidious part of our lives.
>
> So I do blame these folks for not having the character to do what
> they said they would do. I am not on a warpath but these are
> fundamental issues of integrity.
>
> Actually, Jerry, after these many years of your participation in
> the CR list (thanks!) I know you are just trying to be generous in
> this case and that you and I are on the same page here...
>
> Dale

+----------------------------------------------+ | \u201cRelativity applies to physics, not ethics\u201d | | -Albert Einstein | +----------------------------------------------+

Chuck Schmidt
South Pasadena, CA USA