RE: [CR] Crescent stainless on eBay

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Chater-Lea)

Subject: RE: [CR] Crescent stainless on eBay
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 02:01:40 -0700
In-reply-to: <8C96F95DC4B8C43-294-65D4@mblk-d50.sysops.aol.com>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Topic: [CR] Crescent stainless on eBay
thread-index: AcehfsVAr3eRkjrIRxmuIAia1fZqrQBF2Xqw
References: <9327C3B25BD3C34A8DBC26145D88A90706456C@hippy.home.here>
From: "Mark Bulgier" <Mark@bulgier.net>
To: <oroboyz@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


Dale wrote:
> Does anyone on the CR-list have one of these bikes?

http://ebay.com/<blah>
> I have seen maybe three of these in my life and that was quite a while
> ago but my distinct lasting impressions were that they gave some
> Swedish  "MASTER CRAFTSMEN" a bad reputation... I.e., they were
> extremely rough in execution. The lug lining or pin striping was also
> very sloppy...

The seller sent me 11 pretty good closeup photos, and I put them up at:

http://bulgier.net/pics/bike/CoolBikes/CrescentStainless/

Unfortunately they only reinforced my belief that the starting bid is too high. If Dale thought the original pinstriping was rough, wait 'til he sees this one. It looks like it was done with the brush you paint a barn with. An ugly barn.

The BB shell is so cheezy, and with brazing so lumpy, that I wonder if maybe the shell was replaced at some point? By an amateur or beginner repairman at that - no pro framebuilder I know would let work like that out of the shop. Could the vaunted Crescent Stainless really have been that cobby originally? Yuk.

I fear the seller, if he reads this , may take offense, but none is intended. There's nothing wrong with putting a bike up for auction, just because I think it's ugly! Especially a historically interesting, collectable bike like this.

Mark Bulgier
Seattle WA USA