Re: [CR]re: We are truly... mainstream-how much faster you'd be

(Example: Framebuilders:Richard Moon)

In-Reply-To: <75d04b480708021913w7d43a366n59d9560cb17428b7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2EE0D947EB994CD09AE26EA77EF8F2D3@JB> <8801bb250708021736m1d89ae98j631c44412a13ff2f@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]re: We are truly... mainstream-how much faster you'd be
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 20:07:29 -0700
To: CR RENDEZVOUS <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


On Aug 2, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Kurt Sperry wrote:
> And the '60s mechanical watch will be
> accurate to within a few seconds a day, how much functional value
> is added
> by a little more accuracy? Really?

Reminds me... even a broken watch has the spot-on-atomic-clock- accurate time of day once every 12 hours!

"Tis with our judgments as our watches: None go just alike, yet each believes his own." --Alexander Pope (1688-1744)

Chuck Schmidt
South Pasadena, CA