Re: [CR]On Topic Campag&Clone Cranks vs. "Modern" Bottom Brackets

(Example: Framebuilding:Paint)

Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:19:23 -0600 (CST)
From: <smwillis@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]On Topic Campag&Clone Cranks vs. "Modern" Bottom Brackets
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, r cielec <teaat4p@yahoo.com>


I am pretty shore the taper is the same and Phil and some other ones will all work. http://netmail.verizon.net/webmail/static/images/spacer.gif http://netmail.verizon.net/webmail/static/images/spacer.gif>From: r cielec <teaat4p@yahoo.com>
>Date: 2007/12/30 Sun PM 12:19:14 CST
>To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
>Subject: [CR]On Topic Campag&Clone Cranks vs. "Modern" Bottom Brackets
>Ahoy !
>
>I am writing from a service parts need to "keep 'em flying".
>
>I read or perhaps mis-read, an off-hand comment in a recent CR posting
>that there is a difference of spindle tapers for the Campag NR/SR and
>modern Campag bottom brackets. I thought the eternal difference was
>only two: either one and only one type of Campag vs. one and only one
>type of JIS. But, now what - there is more than one type of Campag
>taper ?
>
>For On Topic cranks, specifically Campag NR/SR&Clones, what "modern"
>Campag spindles/bb's have the wrong taper and will ruin On Topic cranks
>?
>
>I was considering using the affordable and available ACH cartridge bb's
>for my NR/SR cranks.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Richard Cielec
>Chicago, Illinois; U.S.A.
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>Be a better friend, newshound, and
>know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>_______________________________________________

Stevn Willis
The Bike Stand
1778 East 2nd Street
Scotch Plains NJ 07076
thebikestand.com
908-322-330