Re: [CR]Still confused about Cinellis

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Cinelli)

Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:46:18 -0700
From: "Kurt Sperry" <haxixe@gmail.com>
To: "jeff-arg@bizwi.rr.com" <jeff-arg@bizwi.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Still confused about Cinellis
In-Reply-To: <5p5kll$f2bkp@rrcs-agw-02b.hrndva.rr.com>
References: <5p5kll$f2bkp@rrcs-agw-02b.hrndva.rr.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

My what I reckon to be a '71 SC has drilled lugs but undrilled tangs.

Kurt Sperry Bellingham WA USA

On 5/7/07, jeff-arg@bizwi.rr.com <jeff-arg@bizwi.rr.com> wrote:
>
> All this chat about Cinellis got me curious about the dropouts and such on
> my two SC's.
>
> My earlier bike, which I have figured for a '66 or '67 has the undrilled
> lugs, fender mounting boss on chain stay bridge, four digit serial number,
> no oil holes in bottom bracket shell, faint remains of what appears to be
> GF+ stamp on bb shell, no fender mounting loops on dropouts (although these
> were probably cut off at some time). The right rear drop out does have the
> boss and hole for the GS derailleur spring. What do y'all Cinelligentsia
> think?
>
> My later bike I have figured for a '68 or '69. It has the drilled lugs,
> but with fender mounting bosses and loops, four digit serial number. But
> here is the part that makes me think it's an early drilled lug frame; the
> fork lug tangs are not drilled. Any comments from the Cinelli Cognoscenti?