Re: [CR]In defense of Bernard Carre

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Ideale)

Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Fred Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]In defense of Bernard Carre
To: alex m <alexpianos@yahoo.fr>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <644145.47225.qm@web26605.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>


> I have posted this before, but check out
       >
       > http://www.reneherse.com/Helyettpiste.html
       >
       > I have the bike here by the computer and I can't see
       > a detail on this bike that is not superb and of the
       > top level. As nice or better than any Italian bike
       > of the time.
       >
       > And the Anquetil hour record bike is even better.
       >
       > So what you can say is that Carre was capable of the
       > very best in his early bikes, whereas the later bikes
       > are of uneven quality to say the least...
       >
       > Alexander March
       > Bordeaux
       > France Alex,
     It's true - those earlier bike were superb. But I hope my comments were not totally misunderstood. That is, even the later frames, which often have a few crude elements, also had many desirable qualities.
     For example, my 1975 LeJeune track bike is more comfortable than any other track bike I've ridden, as well as being very light. It was clearly built for larger velodromes - i.e. 400 meter circuits - and it's a reasonably comfortable bike on the road.
      Best regards,
      Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia (USA)