Re: [CR]50 mm stem


Example: History:Ted Ernst

Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:08:04 -0500
To: <wfbibb@bellsouth.net>
From: Mark Stonich <bikesmith@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]50 mm stem
In-Reply-To: <000b01c7c644$56689a00$6101a8c0@DCV57461>
References: <000b01c7c644$56689a00$6101a8c0@DCV57461>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

At 7/14/2007 02:25 PM -0400, wfbibb@bellsouth.net wrote:
>My 1981 Trek 610 is a little too large at 56cm and I have swtiched to a
>50mm handlebar stem to compensate. However, it seems to make the
>steering a bit more sensitive than I like. While acknowleding that
>steering geometery is complex and handling is a subjective topic, does
>anyone have an opinion of how short a stem it "too" short? I need to
>balance the steering with the reach and buying new Nitto stems is
>getting expensive.
>
>Thanks

Frank, I need to sit fairly upright, so my stems are tall and either 40 or 50mm offset. Handling feel natural to me because that's what I'm used to. An extension that is radically different than what you are used to always feels odd because your hands follow a different path. With shorties it's more fore and aft and less side to side than you are used to.

I do have a slightly more rearward weight distribution than my bikes were designed for, as you will too. But unless one is cornering at the limits of adhesion or carrying a heavy load I don't think it's a big deal. Reaction on the roll axis will be slightly slowed, for a given angular deflection of the front wheel, but IMHO you will quickly adjust.

One problem may be if you have several bikes and only one with a short stem. In which case it may always seem odd to you unless it's your main ride.

Mark Stonich;
     BikeSmith Design & Fabrication
       5349 Elliot Ave S. - Minneapolis. MN 55417
            Ph. (612) 824-2372 http://bikesmithdesign.com
                        http://mnhpva.org