Re: [CR]1958 Louis Pitard randonneur - first ride

(Example: Framebuilders:Alberto Masi)

Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:01:47 -0700
From: "Mitch Harris" <mitch.harris@gmail.com>
To: "Simon P-J" <simonpj@mac.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]1958 Louis Pitard randonneur - first ride
In-Reply-To: <C3F9AB0D.49796%simonpj@mac.com>
References: <1e4701b80803090705q14c5ca99n4f31bd80bbc7baf0@mail.gmail.com>
cc: Classic Rendezvous Bike List <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

Thanks for the report and great photographs. Do you mind sharing the size? Looks like a tall frame and long top tube.

One question: The upper tail light on the rear mudguard looks like it's mounted upside down? If you twisted it 180 degrees the red surface would face to the rear rather than straight up as now. Is there something I'm missing about how these work?

Mitch Harris Little Rock Canyon, UT

On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Simon P-J <simonpj@mac.com> wrote:
> I was able to enjoy a first 25 mile ride on the Louis Pitard this morning .
>
> (http://www.wooljersey.com/gallery/simonpj/Louis+Pitard+1958+original+c on
> d
> ition/)
>
> I was very surprised to find that the 40mm wide 650b tyres didnĀ¹t feel at
> all slow. (They are old Michelins rated at 40 psi which I was riding at 5 0
> psi.) And they were wonderfully comfortable - making it much more relaxin g
> to ride quickly through the poor and damaged road surfaces at the cyclist s'
> edge of the road.
>
> The bike felt incredibly stable - which actually meant that I found it
> easier to hustle through tight bends with poor road surfaces than more
> nimble bikes that are more prone to over-correcting.
>
> It's not a light bike, but with the large Lefol mudguards, front rack,
> dynamo and lights and the large, heavy tyres it's not at all bad at 27.5
> lbs. I wasn't aware of the weight - or the width of the tyres. The bike f el
> t
> happy at a fast pace - and my time for my regular 25 mile route was up th er
> e
> with what I do on 20 lb lightweights. Which admittedly may be more of a
> reflection on the fact that I don't go fast enough for differences betwee n
> bikes to make much difference!
>
> Probably the main revelation from the superficial impression of a first r id
> e
> was great shape of the randonneur bars - which have an unusually long run
> forward from the tops with an upward curve which sits very comfortably un de
> r
> the palms. This makes a very comfortable hand position and means that
> there's little need to ride on the brake hoods. Which made sense of the f ac
> t
> that the bike as I found it had the brakes mounted quite low so that they
> were only accessible from the drops.
>
> Having ridden the bike I'm now more inclined to have the rust on the top an
> d
> down tubes dealt with - even if that means sacrificing some or all of the
> original finish. It would be a great shame for the bike not to be in full y
> rideable condition.
>
> Wyndham Pulman-Jones
> Girton, Cambs., UK.