Re: [CR]Fwd: CR Rules--Wahl's response

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:09:29 -0400
From: "Michael Schmidt" <mdschmidt56@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Fwd: CR Rules--Wahl's response
In-reply-to: <1206207579.47e5445bc9e9a@www.mrrabbit.net>
To: <mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Thread-topic: [CR]Fwd: CR Rules--Wahl's response
Thread-index: AciMR97iHaz+GPg7Edy2RAAWy8lbaw==


Robert,

I totally agree with your point here. About a week after his tasteless post, Mr. C later admitted to fabricating that whole Charlie Wahl response and ultimately apologized to the list at large. An inappropriate use of humor at best. Mr. C's response to me off list was equally as crude but hey if he comes to Cirque, I will buy him a beer just to show him what an OK guy I am.

As far as shooting hime off the list, I am certain that Dale will deal with the matter in his own way.

Mike Schmidt Stirling, NJ USA

On 3/22/08 1:39 PM, "mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net" <mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net> wrote:
> Mr. Jourdain has a very valid point below...
>
> Posting responses to inquiries that are private to public is borderline, but
> doing so for private responses to a dispute is unethical...
>
> Unless an apology is forthcoming from Mr. Chanberasekaran to Mr. Wahl AND the
> List - I hereby cast the first vote for a ban of Mr. Chanberasekaran.
>
> =8-)
>
> Robert Shackelford
> http://www.mrrabbit.net
> mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net
> mrrabbit@speakeasy.net
> 3202 Everdale Drive
> San Jose
> California
> Evergreen Area
> Old Housing Section
> West Creekside
> 95148
> USA
>
>
>
> Archive-URL: http://search.bikelist.org/getmsg.asp
> Filename=classicrendezvous.10803.0959.eml
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Peter Jourdain <pjourdain(AT)yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [CR]Fwd: CR Rules--Wahl's response
>
> Dear Mr. Chanberasekaran ---
>
> Did Mr. Wahl give you PERMISSION to post to the List
> his PRIVATE, OFFLIST correspondence with you? Not very
> cricket. While I strongly disagree with Mr. Wahl's
> initial public post and the inferences aimed at Dale,
> I actually did receive from Mr. Wahl a private
> response to my CR message that was restrained,
> well-reasoned and gentlemanly.
>
> But then again, I didn't end my missive with an
> interrogatory accusing Mr. Wahl of being mentally ill.
> After the string of invective Mr. Wahl has received
> both on and offlist, some of it actionably libelous,
> what kind of response do you expect? ("Garbage in,
> garbage out") And then to publish it here...it can
> only be an attempt to hoist Mr. Wahl up publicly on
> his own private petard. He wrote those words to YOU,
> not to US.
>
> And, sorry to say, mate, I believe you also failed to
> sign off properly.
>
> Peter Jourdain
> Whitewater, Wisconsin
> United States of America
>
>
>
>
> --
> PRIVACY WARNING: For auditing purposes, a copy of this message has been
> saved in a permanent database.