Re: [CR]pogliaghi on ebay

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

From: "Robert Clair" <r.clair@cox.net>
To: "Charles Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com>
References: <003001c89284$49402ca0$6401a8c0@DELL> <001401c8929e$4c910680$0202a8c0@Leo> <009a01c892aa$4e8a4800$6401a8c0@DELL>
Subject: Re: [CR]pogliaghi on ebay
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:23:01 -0500
reply-type=response
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

... years ago, ken denney had a Pogliaghi track frame on ebay. it was going for something like $1150. i had watched it a bit and on the last day said no, this is a major disrespect. so we drank the koolaid, and we got it. needless to say it had a bit of a paint splash on the down tube, but otherwise it was exec. it has a good home here now. white/red/diamond cutouts and a mint campy track group.

sometimes you have to pay to play. and then live with the results.

roberto linguini tonight,
even the cat is getting into the clam sauce.
alexandria, va 22308


----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Andrews
To: Robert Clair
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]pogliaghi on ebay



> just so. I was remarking on the same thing to another correspondent a
> moment ago. It's very tough to get Pogliaghis from before 1980, in any
> condition at all, and that one is near-mint. Whether or not the parts are
> correct for the vintage, it'd be very appealing to the right person.
>
> c
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Clair" <r.clair@cox.net>
> To: "Charles Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com>;
> <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 12:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [CR]pogliaghi on ebay
>
>
>> .... mark twain said something to the effect that ... whatever ...
>> they're not making land anymore. good luck to the new owner.
>> robert clair
>> alexandria, va 22308
>> green eggs and ham tonight
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Charles Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com>
>> To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 11:37 AM
>> Subject: [CR]pogliaghi on ebay
>>
>>
>>>I have to say, I'm very impressed with just how high this Pogliaghi is
>>> going..
>>>
>>> http://ebay.com/<blah>
>>> geName=ADME:B:WNA:US:1123
>>>
>>> Nice bike, but not the really early style most prized by some of us.
>>>
>>> And am I wrong, or are those panto'd parts a little anachronistic?
>>> would this bike have come with those parts? Or were they installed
>>> later? It'd be interesting to know if the panto'd stuff showed up by
>>> the late 70s on Pogliaghis..I had thought that was an 80's artifact.
>>>
>>> It always struck me that pantographing and similar decoration on
>>> Pogliaghis was somehow not consonant with the track-racing fame of the
>>> marque. Such decoration seeming a bit effete for a marque like this. I
>>> can't help wondering if that sort of thing didn't end up on Pogliaghis
>>> after the maestro had retired..if that were true (and I have no proof to
>>> offer), then those parts would post-date that frame somewhat.
>>>
>>> Anyone here have the real timeline?
>>>
>>> Charles Andrews
>>> Los Angeles