Re: [CR]Conservation/restoration etc

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Cinelli)

Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:32:03 +0000 (GMT)
From: <gholl@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Conservation/restoration etc
In-reply-to: <835081.9014.qm@web26606.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
To: alexpianos@yahoo.fr
References: <835081.9014.qm@web26606.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


Alex: I'm replying to you again only since you are a prominent dealer and yo ur statements may influence some collectors. I myself hold you in este em and, as you know, in the past, have even tried to buy a cycle from you. That having been said, no dealers' or collectors' statements can b e spared criticism no matter whether they or their bikes are admired. Rust and corrosion are damage and sooner or later will destroy a cycle.
   An honest dealer (a dealer must be held to a higher standard than a col lector) must never represent them as "patina". I would never buy a
   bike from a dealer who made such representations. Rust and corrosion are never "passive" but are always progressive.
   Their progression varies depending on certain conditions. This is to o well known to require proof. The patina present on museum sculpture is protective and, when damage d, is repaired. As far as repairs to a vintage cycle, they must be done correctly with
   respect for the original finish and design. That is the key issue con fronting the vintage bicycle hobby. Since so few older vintage bikes are now available, let alone in good condition, I do not think you are correct in assuming that more bikes have been destroyed by attempts at repair than by neglect. Of course,
   no one would condone poorly done repairs. Regards, George George Hollenberg MD CT, USA


----- Original Message -----
From: "alex m"


Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:18 am Subject: [CR]Conservation/restoration etc To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Obviously you shouldn't leave any "patina" on a bike that is
> actively damag
> ing to it's condition.
>
> Of the four bikes I sent photos of the Bastide was the "limit"
> case and the
> one I was expecting this sort of criticism about.
>
> It appears to me that the corrosion on the Bastide is passive,
> not active,
> and that it will stabilise in this condition if the bike is
> conserved in a
> dry atmosphere. But if someone can prove this is scientifically
> incorrect,
> then I will agree the bike should be cleaned polished and waxed.
> NOT restor
> ed under any circumstance. On the other hand, the bike has been
> here a numb
> er of years, and the condition hasn't changed one bit.
>
> In museums, I haven't noticed that bronze Greek statues are
> polished up to
> a high finish, and the green surface oxydation removed to get
> back to the o
> riginal colour? I understand that the patina is actually a
> surface protect
> ion against the ravages of time.
>
> But of course all of these museum curators might just be idiots,
> or not hav
> e enough skill, money, or talent to restore/have their works of
> art restore
> d properly?
>
> Anyway my point was : far more damage has been done to bicycles
> by the "il
> faut que ça brille" ("let's get this nice and shiny") brig ade
> than by the
> conservationists.
>
> In actual fact I think that at the next Cirque there should be
> an "over-res
> tored" category. Winners should be made to hand over any bike
> they have not
> already destroyed, and banned from buying any more bikes until
> they have a
> mended their ways.
>
> Alexander March
> Bordeaux
> France
>
>


> _______________________ ________________________ ________________________ ______ Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intellig
> ente http://mail.yahoo.fr
> _______________________ ________________________


>

George Hollenberg MD

CT, USA