[CR]Freewheel Spacing??

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <116374.1863.qm@web83514.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Subject: [CR]Freewheel Spacing??

Recently ordered a custom 16-34 Shimano 5 speed FW from Loose Screws for my 1972 Follis 172, as I intended to commute on it with a fairly heavy large laptop in the pannier, and one short but steep hill on the way to work. The FW arrived yesterday.

But when installed the Shimano FW in place of the 14-28 Atom, the chain rubbed the seatstay when on the small cog. This is a newer Chinese made FW body, with a mix of new and NOS cogs. It appears the Shimano is simply wider than the Atom. The lip behind the inner cog that butts against the hub shell doesn't seem much different, so I think ether the cogs are thicker, or the spacers thicker, or both. Probably more the spacers, as the cogs cannot be too much thicker and still accept 3/32 chain.

Both the Atom and Shimano are supposedly "normal" 5 speed spacing, but the Shimano is quite obviously wider. Has anyone else observed significant variation in the actual spacing of FW's of different brands? There were of course the SunTour Ultras and narrow spaced FW's from other manufacturers, but it appears even "normal" spaced FW's varied a lot. Was Shimano notorious for having wider spacing than others?

Did most manufacturers use the same spacers for "normal" 5-speed as for "normal" 6 speed, or was even the "normal" 6 speed spacing a bit narrower than 5 speed? Are there thinner spacers that will fit a Shimano 5 speed FW?

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Big Spring, Texas, USA