Re: [CR]Wanted: Trek 330 info

(Example: Framebuilders:Brian Baylis)

Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:18:46 -0400
From: <bjwebel@mac.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
in-reply-to: <MONKEYFOODijb1u2ZN900003de0@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org>
references:
Subject: Re: [CR]Wanted: Trek 330 info


The 330 was indeed an entry level "sport touring" frame. My first real bike was one step above it, an '87 Trek 400, which had Reynolds 531. As I recall, Trek went to True Temper the next year, so the '88 date sounds right. Do you have pics? There was a definite decal change from 87-88, so it's easy to see between the years. I believe I still have the '87 Trek brochure, that I'd be happy to scan; if anybody out there is interested in posting it on the web, drop me a line.

I would think you'd be fine light touring on it as long as the frame doesn't have any rust issues from the age. I beat mine up for a long time, first riding around college and then using it as a fixed gear commuter through winter weather for 10-odd years. Finally retired it to my parent's house to use the couple of days a year that I am there, but it still rides very nicely.

Baird

_____________________________________ Baird Webel Washington DC

On Sunday, August 24, 2008, at 08:49PM, <classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org> wrote:
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:13:34 -0400
>From: cigar460@aol.com
>To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>Subject: [CR]Wanted: Trek 330 info
>Message-ID: <8CAD43D053B524E-1A98-37B@MBLK-M08.sysops.aol.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Precedence: list
>Message: 6
>
>Hello All,
>
>I just built up a Trek 330 frame that I got on FleaBay. It's
>supposedly from 1988, serial # T8E 52717. Stickers say True Temper
>RC-1 double butted 4130. Fork says chrome-molybdenum. Dimensions:
>seat tube 62, TT 59, head tube angle 74.5, chainstays 44, wheelbase 104.
>
>I'm guessing that this was a "sport touring" model..it has single
>eyelets front and rear for fenders/rack. Right now it's set up as a
>city commuter 7 spd, but might want to do some longer rides or credit
>card touring. I think this was one of their lower end models.
>
>Does anyone have any more info on this model? Would it work suitably
>for light touring? Around the city, it seems comfortable enough.
>Thanks, in advance.
>
>Alan LaVine
>New York, New York, USA
>------------------------------