Re: [CR]seat post minimum insertion question


Example: Production Builders:LeJeune

Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:48:12 -0500
From: Dmitry Yaitskov <dima@rogers.com>
To: dan kasha <dankasha@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]seat post minimum insertion question
In-Reply-To: <769562.33413.qm@web110413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <769562.33413.qm@web110413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Hi,

Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 3:32:27 PM, dan kasha wrote:
> I believe that this is enough, but wanted to check. Also, what is
> the reason for the minimum? Is it to protect the post, the
> frame, or both? I bet people have stories on this.

When I was a small kid, I had a bike that became too small for me, and IIRC it ended with me raising the seat as far as I could (leaving just enough of the seat post inside to clamp it, i.e. maybe about 20-30mm), and promptly breaking the seat lug off the bike. Of course, that was a cheap children's bike, but I would imagine the same could happen on a on-topic bike. I am no expert and cannot say how adequate would be the 70mm you mention, though.

--
Cheers,
Dmitry Yaitskov,
Toronto, Canada.