Re: [CR]Ethical question as applies to Vintage bike parts transactions...


Example: Humor

References: <8CB2CD3938A7F3D-1840-20E0@FWM-M03.sysops.aol.com> <8CB2CE3073D8950-1C14-6F3@FWM-M03.sysops.aol.com> <8CB2CECF62CC67C-9B0-D09@WEBMAIL-MZ04.sysops.aol.com>
To: oroboyz@aol.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Ethical question as applies to Vintage bike parts transactions...
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8CB2CECF62CC67C-9B0-D09@WEBMAIL-MZ04.sysops.aol.com>
From: cwstudio@aol.com


Hello all,

My first question is: why wait a year? Person B should simply cancel the fir st check and send another, within 2 weeks. 

Problem solved.

Why the time delay?

Person A has lost his items, which could be sold elsewhere, and Person B has lost his credibility, which to my way of thinking is worth more than pretty much any old bike stuff.

Chris Wimpey

San Diego, CA 

USA

-----Original Message----- From: Dale Brown <oroboyz@aol.com> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Sent: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 8:54 am Subject: [CR]Ethical question as applies to Vintage bike parts transactions. ..

OK friends...   

Here is a situation that we all could find ourselves in.   

Two reliable, mature & honest CR members agree to a transaction.   

Person A ships object to Person B & he receives it.   

Person B sends the correct amount of cash to person A.   

Person A does not receive payment, it is lost in the mail. A year long wait prove this...   

Who is responsible for the loss? Who is "out", the seller or the buyer?Â

 

Dale Brown 

Greensboro, North Carolina USA 

http://www.classicrendezvous.comÂ