[CR] Actually using a Helicomatic

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
Authentication-Results: smtp01.embarq.synacor.com smtp.user=hdarr@embarqmail.com; auth=pass (LOGIN)
From: "Howard Darr" <hdarr@embarqmail.com>
To: 'Howard Darr' <hdarr@embarqmail.com>, <hsachs@alumni.rice.edu>, 'Classic Rendezvous' <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <49CEC689.10206@verizon.net> <4CE397235DE94AF6990700122ED16B47@UserPC>
In-Reply-To: <4CE397235DE94AF6990700122ED16B47@UserPC>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:28:12 -0400
Thread-Index: AcmwCM/Xp38H/A12Tuy9YlYs3zfHbAAAudMwABj+UXA=
Subject: [CR] Actually using a Helicomatic


Dear All,

I was unclear about what hub I regaled as bulletproof in my last post.

Snip <<<<<Actually I have been going back and forth since before Christmas. On one hand I have 3 bikes with this hub in either the 5 or 6 speed iteration that are bulletproof.>>>>>

The quandary is that I am unsure of the helicomatic.

The hub that I love is the Shimano 600 first generation UG cassette hub. It is not quite the hub of today because the free hub body is attached by a press fit spline system instead of the familiar bolt attachment.

I was drawn to them back in the day because of the bearing placement and the ability to really reduce the dish on a wheel. I have stuck with them because many miles have passed and I have not broken or bent axles, nor does the freehub connection with cassette body seem to have accumulated any sloppyness. I appreciate the value of the aforementioned benefits balanced with the uselessness but vintage look of the oil hole.

The only warning I might give is that since the largest cog is closer to the spokes the derailleur hanger must be straight if you run smallish cogs.

Howard Darr
Kinsman OH USA